{"id":97,"date":"2026-10-11T09:33:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-11T09:33:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/?p=97"},"modified":"2026-10-11T09:33:01","modified_gmt":"2026-10-11T09:33:01","slug":"lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/","title":{"rendered":"LEGO Spybotics: When LEGO Sent Kids on Secret Robot Missions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n

A LEGO robot, a PC and a secret mission that ended up on the floor instead of staying inside the monitor. I like that idea. LEGO Spybotics tried it in 2002, with four small robots built around programmable electronics. The computer gave you the briefing and the settings. Your room supplied the battlefield.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is easy to look at something like this now and laugh at the old software, the serial cable and the spy nonsense. I think that misses the interesting part. LEGO was giving ordinary household objects a job inside a computer-controlled game. A lamp could become a goal. A book could become an obstacle. The instructions you chose on the PC could change what a real machine did afterwards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I have been gaming since the late 1980s and early 1990s, and I care much more about what a system lets me do than how impressive the sales pitch sounds. Spybotics has a good pitch. Whether it had enough freedom, variety and staying power behind that pitch is a harder question. A clever toy can still run out of interesting things to do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The<\/a>
Gigamesh G60: the blue robot featured in the Danish article, with the PC software part of the promise. Archival set image hosted by Brickset<\/a>. View full image<\/a>.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Four robots, one basic system<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The four main sets arrived in 2002: 3806 Gigamesh G60, 3807 Snaptrax S45, 3808 Shadowstrike S70 and 3809 Technojaw T55.<\/strong> Each had its own shape and colour scheme, with LEGO Technic parts built around an electronic control unit. The box also brought the controller, download cable and software disc needed for the wider Spybotics experience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Set<\/th>Robot<\/th>Colour \/ design<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
3806<\/td>Gigamesh G60<\/td>Blue \u00b7 wheeled<\/td><\/tr>
3807<\/td>Snaptrax S45<\/td>Red \u00b7 tracked<\/td><\/tr>
3808<\/td>Shadowstrike S70<\/td>Purple \u00b7 wheeled<\/td><\/tr>
3809<\/td>Technojaw T55<\/td>Green \u00b7 wheeled<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>
The four main Spybotics sets released in 2002.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"A<\/a>
Snaptrax S45: the tracked design, with its matching red controller. Archival set image hosted by Brickset<\/a>. View full image<\/a>.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"The<\/a>
Shadowstrike S70: another very serious name for a machine that might spend its mission driving around books. Archival set image hosted by Brickset<\/a>. View full image<\/a>.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"A<\/a>
Technojaw T55: a different body built around the same basic idea of electronics, construction and missions. Archival set image hosted by Brickset<\/a>. View full image<\/a>.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Gigamesh G60 is the model featured in the old Danish Computer for Alle<\/em> article. The blue electronics, exposed construction and mechanical-looking body fit the name. Snaptrax goes for tracks, while the other designs use different wheeled arrangements. I like that they look like machines somebody might actually build out of Technic. The electronics are part of the design rather than a completely separate device sitting beside the toy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The names are also wonderfully early 2000s. Gigamesh G60. Shadowstrike S70. Technojaw T55. A set number alone apparently would not have sounded classified enough. They look ready to steal military data, although their actual assignment might involve getting past a shoe. That gap between the dramatic packaging and an ordinary room is part of the appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Four different bodies also give the range some character. I would still judge them by what those bodies allow me to change. A different colour and a more aggressive name do not automatically create a different game. The electronics, mission rules and available reactions matter more than whether the robot looks like the meanest thing on the bedroom floor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Building instructions were on the computer too<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The PC was involved before the first mission. The original building instructions were supplied through the CD-ROM software rather than a paper booklet. That made the program more than an optional extra. It was also how the buyer was expected to put the robot together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"An<\/a>
The instructions were on screen. Building the robot already depended on the CD-ROM software. Archived screenshot of original Spybotics CD-ROM software<\/a>. View full image<\/a>.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

I can see the attraction of animated steps and an interface that remembers where you stopped. But requiring a computer to read the instructions is an awkward decision for LEGO. Building on a table is straightforward. Building while referring to a family PC adds another thing that has to be available, working and in the right place. The software can make a step clearer and still make the whole activity less convenient.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That matters more now. A box full of ordinary LEGO pieces can be rebuilt from a surviving booklet without caring which operating system is installed. Spybotics tied even the start of the experience to the software. I do not like treating that as a small detail. Instructions are part of the product, and making them dependent on an ageing program puts another obstacle between the owner and the thing they bought.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The PC prepared the game. The robot carried it into the room.<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The basic process was to build the robot, choose a mission, prepare the room, adjust the available settings and transfer the mission through the supplied PC serial cable. After disconnecting the robot, the player could take the mission onto the floor. Infrared communication served the controller and interactions between robots; the mission download itself required the cable connection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That division is what I find interesting. The PC can handle briefings, menus and settings, while the robot supplies movement and feedback. The room becomes the map. Instead of another digital object bumping into another digital wall, there is a physical machine meeting something you put in its way. You can change the arrangement without waiting for a level editor to understand it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is work involved in that freedom. Somebody has to clear a space, place the obstacles and get the robot ready. A computer game can load its level in the same state every time. A bedroom does not do that for you. For someone who enjoys setting things up, that is part of the fun. For someone who wants to start immediately, it is another delay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Preparation has to pay off. If the mission is over quickly and the next one feels much the same, all that setting up becomes harder to justify. The real-world part needs to create interesting choices. Making a short game take longer to start does not give it more depth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ten missions did not mean ten solo missions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The included software had ten preset missions<\/strong>. Five worked with one robot, and the other five required two. The one-robot group included Laser Maze<\/em>, Command Override<\/em>, Gamma Overload<\/em>, Energy Crisis<\/em> and X-Factor<\/em>. One robot did not always mean one player: X-Factor<\/em> called for two agents sharing that robot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The other group included The Mole<\/em>, Critical Countdown<\/em>, Robot Rescue<\/em>, Face Off<\/em> and Circuit Breaker<\/em>. That is a better picture of what the box offered than saying ten missions and leaving the buyer to assume everything was available with one set.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The<\/a>
A dramatic briefing on the PC, then a much more ordinary room in which to carry out the job. Archived screenshot of original Spybotics CD-ROM software<\/a>. View full image<\/a>.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

I like having more than one way to use the machine. I am less impressed when half the preset list depends on access to another expensive robot. A friend owning one would help. A family buying two would help. Somebody with one set and nobody nearby with another had a smaller product than the headline mission count suggested.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The mission settings could be adjusted, and the Special Operations area let users create scenarios from templates. That adds room to experiment. It does not make every mission completely open. Choosing conditions within LEGO’s framework is different from being able to define any behaviour or rule I can imagine. I want to know where that boundary sits before calling something endlessly replayable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Energy Crisis shows both the good idea and the limit<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In Energy Crisis<\/em>, household obstacles and a light source became part of the mission. The robot could lose simulated energy, and reaching the light represented getting to the goal. The lamp was doing an actual job through the light sensor. It was not just a prop beside a game that ignored it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is a good use of simple hardware. The player understands the obstacle and the destination without needing a complex virtual world. Moving a book changes the route. Moving the lamp changes the goal. The same room can support a different attempt because the objects have moved, not because the software has downloaded another level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But I would eventually want more than reaching the lamp by a slightly different route. Change a timer, make the course tighter or move the obstacle, and the underlying task may remain familiar. Physical rearrangement can keep a good activity going. It cannot turn every small variation into a completely new challenge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I also think the fictional explanation has to earn its place. An electromagnetic threat sounds exciting. A shoe is still a shoe. That can be funny and imaginative, but if the player stops buying into the story, the mission has to survive on its actual rules. The briefing cannot do all the work of making a simple drive interesting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A desk lamp with a top-secret job<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The spy dressing is slightly ridiculous in a way I like. The robot gets a dramatic mission, the software acts like headquarters and a household lamp suddenly becomes important infrastructure. Someone looking into the room sees a LEGO vehicle driving around books. The person playing sees the mission. That is how ordinary toys have always worked; Spybotics added electronic rules to the make-believe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I do not need to sneer at that because it was made for children. I also do not think being made for children excuses a thin game. A child can notice when the machine only has a few tricks. Calling everything secret, advanced or classified does not give those tricks more depth. The silly names are fun. They are not a substitute for things worth trying after the first afternoon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Programmable, but within a fairly small box<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Spybotics used a central unit with two motors, touch and light sensing, lights, sound and infrared communication. Much of that hardware was grouped together. Compared with the separate motors and sensor connections of an RCX-based Mindstorms setup, it offered a compact starting point with fewer pieces of electronics to arrange.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The supplied program let players assign action capsules to sensor conditions and controller buttons. That could produce automatic reactions or a mission using more direct control. The official software was not simply a remote-control dashboard. It did give the robot behaviours that could continue without the player manually issuing every movement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is a useful first step. The limitation is how much room the interface leaves once the player understands it. A selection of prepared actions can make the first result easy and the next ambitious idea difficult. If I can see what I want the machine to do but cannot express it with the available choices, the toy has stopped helping me experiment and started telling me where to stop.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I would want the learning to grow with the user’s curiosity. Begin with a simple mission, then let them inspect the behaviour and change more of it. Otherwise the product risks being too involved for somebody who only wants a car, yet too restrictive for somebody who wants to program a robot. That is an uncomfortable place for a technology toy to end up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There was more potential in the hardware than the standard mission interface exposed. The NQC Programmer’s Guide<\/a> explicitly supported Spybotics as a target. Owners willing to use a separate programming language could go further. I like that possibility, but I would not give the original software all the credit for what enthusiasts could make the machine do outside it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A compact control unit is convenient until it becomes the boundary<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Putting so much into one unit makes the robot easier to get moving. It also concentrates the important parts into something the user cannot rearrange as freely as ordinary Technic. Change the body and it is still working around the same motors, sensing and controller. The mechanical construction can change more easily than the electronic abilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is why I do not see Spybotics as a straightforward replacement for Mindstorms. A compact mission vehicle and a broader robot-building system solve different problems. Spybotics can have a more immediate identity, while a more modular system gives the builder more places to change the design. The one that is easiest to start is not automatically the one with the most to offer later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is also a weak point when the toy ages. Ordinary pieces remain useful even if the branded theme disappears. A working electronic unit can continue to be useful too. A failed central unit takes much more of the original experience with it. The robot does not become worthless LEGO, but the reason for buying Spybotics specifically depends heavily on that hardware remaining usable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The room was part of the system, including its lighting<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Infrared is convenient when it works, but the conditions matter. LEGO’s own FAQ warned about direct sunlight and fluorescent lighting disrupting communication. It also described calibrating the light sensor for missions with a light-based goal. The real room was doing more than supplying scenery; its light could affect the electronics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I find that interesting as a technical problem and less charming as an unexplained interruption to play. If something behaves oddly, a child may not know whether the mission settings, the sensor, the controller or the room caused it. The toy needs to make that understandable. Otherwise the promise of learning by experimenting can turn into guessing why nothing is working.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of that uncertainty is part of using a real machine. A robot on a floor is not a perfectly controlled animation. The surface, obstacles and arrangement all matter. I like that when the feedback helps me understand the result. I dislike it when failure gives me no useful clue about what to change next. A mistake can teach something. An opaque malfunction mostly teaches irritation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

649 kroner was only the starting price<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Danish Computer for Alle<\/em> article listed 649 DKK for one set<\/strong>. That bought more than a normal LEGO vehicle: electronics, motors, sensing, a controller and software were part of the package. I understand why it cost more. I would still judge the price against what one buyer could actually do with it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At that same listed price, two sets came to 1,298 DKK<\/strong>. Buying all four would have meant 2,596 DKK<\/strong>. Those are simple multiples of the contemporary price, but they make the multi-robot idea look different. The interesting interaction could require another purchase. I do not like treating access to a second robot as if it were free because a review had two available.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The PC was another requirement, although a household might already have one. Batteries were extra: the robot used three AA cells and the controller three AAA cells, which LEGO said were not included. None of that makes the price dishonest. It does mean 649 kroner is not the whole setup when discussing what a family needed to use it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The question for me is whether the toy stays interesting after the immediate excitement of seeing it move. A good introduction to robotics can justify a purchase. A handful of missions that become familiar quickly makes the same price harder to defend. I would rather have a product with room to grow than one whose most convincing upgrade is buying another box.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How people received Spybotics at the time<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The early coverage shows both the excitement and the limits. WIRED’s December 2002 gift guide<\/a> presented Spybotics enthusiastically as a toy for a young would-be hacker. That fits the appeal: build something, connect it to a PC and give it missions. It was an easy idea to get excited about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hope Katz Gibbs’s August 2002 Washington Post review<\/a> found early appeal but limited staying power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Arno Steinwender’s Spieletest review<\/a>, published on 30 October 2003, was much more positive about the fun and creating missions. It still criticised the missing paper instructions and wanted USB instead of the serial connection. Those were practical weaknesses during the product’s own period, not complaints invented by people trying to use it decades later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Stiftung Warentest’s November 2003 test<\/a> had ten children and teenagers try several technology construction kits. Mindstorms and Spybotics Snaptrax were favourites, but Spybotics became much more enjoyable with a second robot. I think that is one of the most useful findings for judging the package. The good experience could depend on having more than one set.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Source<\/th>Date<\/th>What it highlighted<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
WIRED gift guide<\/a><\/td>December 2002<\/td>The appeal of a computer-linked robot toy.<\/td><\/tr>
Spieletest<\/a><\/td>October 2003<\/td>Enjoyable missions; criticism of the instructions and serial port.<\/td><\/tr>
Stiftung Warentest<\/a><\/td>November 2003<\/td>Popular with the young testers, especially with a second robot.<\/td><\/tr>
Robotspil \u00b7 Aarhus University<\/a><\/td>May 2004<\/td>Useful machines; limited programming and simple bundled games.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>
Period coverage and first-hand research. These are different kinds of assessment, not a combined score.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

I do not read those opinions as one neat verdict. They suggest a product that could be very appealing, especially in the right setup, while still leaving questions about depth and convenience. A good afternoon with two robots does not tell me how one robot holds up over several months. A technical feature list does not tell me whether the child wants to use it again. Those are the questions I care about more than the word educational on the packaging.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Danish robot research was less impressed by the supplied games<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

There is also a useful Danish account in Sune Kristensen’s 2004 Aarhus University thesis, Robotspil<\/em><\/a>. His experience began around the 2002 launch and included robot games and teaching. He described appealing machines and enjoyable experimentation, but criticised simple bundled games, restrictive programming and a weak connection between the on-screen fiction and the physical activity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That last criticism interests me. Spybotics wants the screen to make the floor feel like part of a bigger operation. If the fiction and the physical rules do not support each other well enough, the player is left with a dramatic briefing followed by a much smaller activity. The robot can be fun while the story surrounding it adds less than expected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I would push the same question when looking at the mission software. What does the spy story add to the decisions? Does it give me a reason to use the sensors differently, change the construction or approach the course in another way? Or does it mostly rename the lamp and tell me to drive there again? The answer matters more than how many animated briefings the disc contains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Making your own rules may be the best part<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The part I find strongest is using the equipment to create a game instead of treating the included missions as the limit. Put two machines in a space, change the obstacles, decide what counts as success and see whether the rules produce something worth repeating. That is a more interesting use of LEGO than simply completing instructions and placing the finished model on a shelf.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A race through a course, a push-out-of-the-ring contest or a game built around reaching different light sources are the kinds of possibilities I would want to explore. Their quality would depend on the rules and the machines, not on inventing another serious-sounding mission name. A small change can matter if it gives the players a different problem to solve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I also like being able to change the construction in response to what happens. A shape that looks aggressive might catch on an obstacle. A neat-looking part might get in the way. The next version can be built around the failure. That is where the physical toy can teach something a decorative digital upgrade cannot. The change has to do actual work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That potential does not excuse thin supplied content. Most buyers open the box expecting LEGO to have done some of the game-design work. Enthusiasts making a better activity afterwards shows that the machine had useful possibilities. It does not automatically prove the original package used them well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Nightfall Incident was a separate game worth paying attention to<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Spybotics also had Spybot: The Nightfall Incident<\/em><\/strong>, a 2002 browser game developed by Gamelab for LEGO. It used Shockwave and turned the spy theme into tactical battles inside a fictional network. This was its own on-screen game, rather than the CD-ROM mission tool controlling the physical robots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The<\/a>
The Nightfall Incident gave the spy theme a separate tactical game inside a fictional network. Archived screenshot of the original browser game<\/a>. View full image<\/a>.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"A<\/a>
Programs became units. The interesting part was what to move and use next. Archived screenshot of the original browser game<\/a>. View full image<\/a>.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

You moved through the network and fought turn-based battles using programs as units. The starting pair, Hack<\/em> and Slingshot<\/em>, already had different jobs: Hack needed to get close, while Slingshot attacked from farther away. Winning supplied credits for stronger programs. Positioning and the choice of units could change the result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jay Is Games reviewed it on 15 September 2005<\/a> and strongly praised its tutorial, tactics and progression. That review came later than the robot launch, and it concerns the browser game. I think it is useful evidence that the Spybotics theme could support more than a brief mission wrapper.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That difference in range is the sort of thing I want from a game. It gives me a reason to think about where a unit should go. A bigger collection of dramatic names would not do that by itself. Even the opening pair has a rule behind the name, and the player can use that rule. That is where depth starts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A grid and a few useful decisions can carry a game without an expensive robot. That puts pressure on the toy to make its physical parts count. The construction should affect what happens. Moving an obstacle should give me a reason to change the plan. If the machine is mostly following the same route again, the movement is doing more for the spectacle than for the game.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both versions can have a purpose, but I would judge each on its own. The browser game being good does not fix a restrictive robot interface. The robot being clever does not make the browser game deep. Sharing the same spy organisation and branding connects them; it does not transfer quality from one to the other.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why I would not just call it ahead of its time<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Spybotics had an interesting idea, but LEGO already had Mindstorms before these sets appeared. The company was not inventing programmable LEGO in 2002. It was giving a related idea a smaller, more specific form built around secret missions and compact vehicles. I find that interesting enough without pretending it arrived from the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The four-set range had a short life. That alone does not tell me exactly why it ended. I can see restrictions that might limit its appeal: the PC requirement, a smaller programming interface, limited preset content and more possibilities when another robot was available. Those are reasons to criticise the product. They are not sales figures or proof of a particular internal LEGO decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I would rather ask whether the product did enough with its idea. The machines looked distinctive. The software gave household objects a role. The floor could become a game. The difficulty was keeping that interesting after the novelty passed. Calling something ahead of its time can become a way of avoiding that question, and I do not think Spybotics needs that kind of protection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bricks outlast the software more easily<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The original environment belonged to Windows 98, ME and XP. LEGO’s FAQ listed a 350 MHz processor, 64 MB RAM and a free nine-pin RS-232 serial port. Its software requirements also included QuickTime 5 and DirectX 8, with Flash and Shockwave involved in the online network. That is a very specific period of home computing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A modern machine having more power does not remove those dependencies. The old connector still needs an answer. The program still needs an environment in which it works. The browser content depended on technology ordinary browsers no longer supply. Preserving the pieces, preserving the software and preserving a usable complete setup are different jobs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I care about that because I like old physical things I can return to. A LEGO model should not lose most of its purpose because the computer beside it changed. Some of that is unavoidable with programmable electronics, but the choice to put instructions and mission tools into the software makes the loss larger. Keeping the robot intact preserves the object. It does not automatically preserve the experience sold with it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is the less exciting side of combining physical toys with digital systems. The physical part looks permanent. The digital part can become the reason it is difficult to use. Spybotics did not require today’s sort of app account to make this problem visible. A disc, an old runtime and an old port were enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My verdict: a good idea with limits I would not gloss over<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

I like the central idea of Spybotics. Build a machine, choose how it reacts and give it a job in the room. That gives the computer a physical consequence, and it gives LEGO construction a purpose beyond matching the picture on the box. The spy nonsense makes it approachable and occasionally funny. A household lamp doing duty as secret infrastructure is exactly the sort of silliness a toy should be allowed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am less convinced by the whole package. The supplied games and programming could be limiting. Some of the most interesting play required another robot. The original price was only part of the setup. Even the building instructions depended on the PC. Those weaknesses are large enough to discuss properly instead of covering them with praise for an ambitious concept.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spybotics deserves to be remembered, but I would remember the promise and the restrictions together. LEGO put a game on the floor. The harder job was giving that game enough to keep doing once the owner had seen the robot move, learned its tricks and started wanting more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Article by Kiba Snowpaw \u00b7 The Furry Hardcore Gamer. LEGO and Spybotics imagery \u00a9 their respective rights holders. Set imagery is archived at Brickset; software and browser-game screenshots are archived at Old-Games.ru and Browser Craft. These are credited archive images.<\/small><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Historical reference: Computer for Alle, 2002, including the Danish price of 649 DKK. Further references: LEGO\u2019s 2002 software FAQ<\/a>, archived Spybotics help<\/a>, NQC programming guide<\/a>, Jay Is Games\u2019 2005 Nightfall review<\/a>, Adobe\u2019s Shockwave notice<\/a>. Period tests are linked in the article.<\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A LEGO robot, a PC and a secret mission that ended up on the floor instead of staying inside the monitor. I like that idea. LEGO Spybotics tried it in 2002, with four small robots built around programmable electronics. The computer gave you the briefing and the settings. Your room supplied the battlefield. It is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":98,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"googlesitekit_rrm_CAow86rODA:productID":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[666],"tags":[773,702,775,779,776,780,786,782,781,778,784,785,783,774,777,798,787,792,788,790,789,791,688,793,795,762,799,794,797,796,800,801,802,807,803,806,809,804,805,808,810],"snowpaw_game":[1208],"class_list":["post-97","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-games","tag-2000s-lego","tag-2000s-nostalgia","tag-2000s-technology","tag-childhood-nostalgia","tag-classic-lego","tag-computer-history","tag-forgotten-lego","tag-forgotten-technology","tag-forgotten-toys","tag-gigamesh-g60","tag-lego","tag-lego-2002","tag-lego-computer","tag-lego-history","tag-lego-mindstorms","tag-lego-robotics","tag-lego-robots","tag-lego-software","tag-lego-spy-robots","tag-lego-spybotics","tag-lego-technic","tag-old-lego","tag-pc-gaming","tag-programmable-robots","tag-programming-toys","tag-retro-gaming","tag-retro-lego","tag-retro-pc","tag-retro-tech","tag-retro-technology","tag-robot-toys","tag-robotics-history","tag-secret-spy-robots","tag-shadowstrike-s70","tag-snaptrax-s45","tag-spybotics","tag-tech-history","tag-tech-nostalgia","tag-technojaw-t55","tag-the-nightfall-incident","tag-vintage-lego"],"snowpaw":{"managed":true,"game_id":"lego-spybotics","game_ids":["lego-spybotics"],"games":[{"id":"lego-spybotics","title":"LEGO Spybotics"}],"review_game_ids":[],"cover_sizes":[{"url":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM-300x200.png","width":300},{"url":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/iawd-covers\/98-fc6a18f2f95d-480.webp","width":480},{"url":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/iawd-covers\/98-fc6a18f2f95d-768.webp","width":768},{"url":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM-1024x683.png","width":1024},{"url":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/iawd-covers\/98-fc6a18f2f95d-1200.webp","width":1200}]},"yoast_head":"\nLEGO Spybotics: When LEGO Sent Kids on Secret Robot Missions - The Ice Alpha Wolf Den<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"LEGO Spybotics: When LEGO Sent Kids on Secret Robot Missions - The Ice Alpha Wolf Den\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A LEGO robot, a PC and a secret mission that ended up on the floor instead of staying inside the monitor. I like that idea. LEGO Spybotics tried it in 2002, with four small robots built around programmable electronics. The computer gave you the briefing and the settings. Your room supplied the battlefield. It is […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Ice Alpha Wolf Den\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-11T09:33:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-11T09:33:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM-1024x683.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kiba Snowpaw\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kiba Snowpaw\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"22 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kiba Snowpaw\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9aa16d0f1046d121317e4de844c396f1\"},\"headline\":\"LEGO Spybotics: When LEGO Sent Kids on Secret Robot Missions\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-11T09:33:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-11T09:33:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":4415,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9aa16d0f1046d121317e4de844c396f1\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM.png\",\"keywords\":[\"2000s LEGO\",\"2000s Nostalgia\",\"2000s Technology\",\"Childhood Nostalgia\",\"Classic LEGO\",\"Computer History\",\"Forgotten LEGO\",\"Forgotten Technology\",\"Forgotten Toys\",\"Gigamesh G60\",\"LEGO\",\"LEGO 2002\",\"LEGO Computer\",\"LEGO History\",\"LEGO Mindstorms\",\"LEGO Robotics\",\"LEGO Robots\",\"LEGO Software\",\"LEGO Spy Robots\",\"LEGO Spybotics\",\"LEGO Technic\",\"Old LEGO\",\"PC Gaming\",\"Programmable Robots\",\"Programming Toys\",\"Retro Gaming\",\"Retro LEGO\",\"Retro PC\",\"Retro Tech\",\"Retro Technology\",\"Robot Toys\",\"Robotics History\",\"Secret Spy Robots\",\"Shadowstrike S70\",\"Snaptrax S45\",\"Spybotics\",\"Tech History\",\"Tech Nostalgia\",\"Technojaw T55\",\"The Nightfall Incident\",\"Vintage LEGO\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Games\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/\",\"name\":\"LEGO Spybotics: When LEGO Sent Kids on Secret Robot Missions - The Ice Alpha Wolf Den\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-11T09:33:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-11T09:33:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM.png\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":1024},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/11\\\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"LEGO Spybotics: When LEGO Sent Kids on Secret Robot Missions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Ice Alpha Wolf Den\",\"description\":\"Game reviews, photography and audiobooks\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9aa16d0f1046d121317e4de844c396f1\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9aa16d0f1046d121317e4de844c396f1\",\"name\":\"Kiba Snowpaw\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2a2f88455e1cd93bebe8b4c59c91ce4dd186615e2aea0ca5fd25fa96bffa14e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2a2f88455e1cd93bebe8b4c59c91ce4dd186615e2aea0ca5fd25fa96bffa14e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2a2f88455e1cd93bebe8b4c59c91ce4dd186615e2aea0ca5fd25fa96bffa14e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kiba Snowpaw\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/2a2f88455e1cd93bebe8b4c59c91ce4dd186615e2aea0ca5fd25fa96bffa14e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/theicealphawolfden.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\\\/index.php\\\/author\\\/admin2183\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"LEGO Spybotics: When LEGO Sent Kids on Secret Robot Missions - The Ice Alpha Wolf Den","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"LEGO Spybotics: When LEGO Sent Kids on Secret Robot Missions - The Ice Alpha Wolf Den","og_description":"A LEGO robot, a PC and a secret mission that ended up on the floor instead of staying inside the monitor. I like that idea. LEGO Spybotics tried it in 2002, with four small robots built around programmable electronics. The computer gave you the briefing and the settings. Your room supplied the battlefield. It is […]","og_url":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/","og_site_name":"The Ice Alpha Wolf Den","article_published_time":"2026-10-11T09:33:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-11T09:33:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM-1024x683.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Kiba Snowpaw","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kiba Snowpaw","Estimated reading time":"22 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/"},"author":{"name":"Kiba Snowpaw","@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9aa16d0f1046d121317e4de844c396f1"},"headline":"LEGO Spybotics: When LEGO Sent Kids on Secret Robot Missions","datePublished":"2026-10-11T09:33:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-11T09:33:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/"},"wordCount":4415,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9aa16d0f1046d121317e4de844c396f1"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM.png","keywords":["2000s LEGO","2000s Nostalgia","2000s Technology","Childhood Nostalgia","Classic LEGO","Computer History","Forgotten LEGO","Forgotten Technology","Forgotten Toys","Gigamesh G60","LEGO","LEGO 2002","LEGO Computer","LEGO History","LEGO Mindstorms","LEGO Robotics","LEGO Robots","LEGO Software","LEGO Spy Robots","LEGO Spybotics","LEGO Technic","Old LEGO","PC Gaming","Programmable Robots","Programming Toys","Retro Gaming","Retro LEGO","Retro PC","Retro Tech","Retro Technology","Robot Toys","Robotics History","Secret Spy Robots","Shadowstrike S70","Snaptrax S45","Spybotics","Tech History","Tech Nostalgia","Technojaw T55","The Nightfall Incident","Vintage LEGO"],"articleSection":["Games"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/","url":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/","name":"LEGO Spybotics: When LEGO Sent Kids on Secret Robot Missions - The Ice Alpha Wolf Den","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM.png","datePublished":"2026-10-11T09:33:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-11T09:33:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-9-2026-10_39_09-AM.png","width":1536,"height":1024},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/2026\/10\/11\/lego-spybotics-when-lego-sent-kids-on-secret-robot-missions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"LEGO Spybotics: When LEGO Sent Kids on Secret Robot Missions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/","name":"The Ice Alpha Wolf Den","description":"Game reviews, photography and audiobooks","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9aa16d0f1046d121317e4de844c396f1"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/#\/schema\/person\/9aa16d0f1046d121317e4de844c396f1","name":"Kiba Snowpaw","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2a2f88455e1cd93bebe8b4c59c91ce4dd186615e2aea0ca5fd25fa96bffa14e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2a2f88455e1cd93bebe8b4c59c91ce4dd186615e2aea0ca5fd25fa96bffa14e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2a2f88455e1cd93bebe8b4c59c91ce4dd186615e2aea0ca5fd25fa96bffa14e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kiba Snowpaw"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2a2f88455e1cd93bebe8b4c59c91ce4dd186615e2aea0ca5fd25fa96bffa14e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/theicealphawolfden.com"],"url":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/author\/admin2183\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":99,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97\/revisions\/99"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/98"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97"},{"taxonomy":"snowpaw_game","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.theicealphawolfden.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/snowpaw_game?post=97"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}